FRIDAY (30-SEP-22)

Pair 1 NS - TOM MAJOR / JILLIAN MAJOR
Place: 4, Percentage: 47.88%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	1: KAY SMITH / DI HUME	3NT E	3S	7	100	8	100%
Board 2	1: KAY SMITH / DI HUME	2 N	4S	10	170	3	38%
Board 3	1: KAY SMITH / DI HUME	4 N	7D	10	420	3	38%
Board 4	1: KAY SMITH / DI HUME	2 N	QC	7	-100	2	25%
Board 5	1: KAY SMITH / DI HUME	3 N	QH	8	-100	2.8	35%
Board 6	5: MARY WITSENHUYSEN / JULIET MIDDLETON	3NT W	JC	12	-690	4	50%
Board 7	5: MARY WITSENHUYSEN / JULIET MIDDLETON	2 E	KC	8	-110	4	50%
Board 8	5: MARY WITSENHUYSEN / JULIET MIDDLETON	3NT E	4D	11	-460	1	12%
Board 9	5: MARY WITSENHUYSEN / JULIET MIDDLETON	3 W	JC	8	100	6	75%
Board 10	5: MARY WITSENHUYSEN / JULIET MIDDLETON	3NT S	3S	6	-300	0	0%
Board 11	4: Jennifer Hobson / Kathy Seib	2 E	7H	10	-170	8	100%
Board 12	4: Jennifer Hobson / Kathy Seib	4 N	AC	9	-100	0	0%
Board 13	4: Jennifer Hobson / Kathy Seib	4 E	QS	9	100	8	100%
Board 14	4: Jennifer Hobson / Kathy Seib	6 S	AH	11	-50	0	0%
Board 15	4: Jennifer Hobson / Kathy Seib	3NT S	3H	10	630	2	25%
Board 16	3: GRAHAM NICHOLSON / MIRIAM HARGREAVE	4 W	2S	8	200	8	100%
Board 17	3: GRAHAM NICHOLSON / MIRIAM HARGREAVE	3NT W	3H	10	-430	0	0%
Board 18	3: GRAHAM NICHOLSON / MIRIAM HARGREAVE	4 N	KD	11	650	7	88%
Board 19	3: GRAHAM NICHOLSON / MIRIAM HARGREAVE	3NT S	3S	10	430	8	100%
Board 20	3: GRAHAM NICHOLSON / MIRIAM HARGREAVE	3 E	7S	9	-110	6	75%
Board 21	2: FAYE ROGERS / KERRY GILLAM	5 E	KH	10	50	2	25%
Board 22	2: FAYE ROGERS / KERRY GILLAM	3NT S	5H	8	-50	2	25%
Board 23	2: FAYE ROGERS / KERRY GILLAM	1 W	KD	9	-140	6	75%
Board 24	2: FAYE ROGERS / KERRY GILLAM	2NT E	3C	7	50	3	38%
Board 25	2: FAYE ROGERS / KERRY GILLAM	2 S	TC	10	170	2	25%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results